Volume 15, Issue 3 (Summer 2026)                   aumj 2026, 15(3): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.PS.REC.1403.564

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Balali E, Fallahi R, Mahboubi Rabbani S M E, Naser-ol-Eslami M, Jebali A. Polyaniline-polyacrylic copolymer-loaded nanoliposome: Synthesis, characterization, and apoptosis induction in breast cancer cells (MCF-7). aumj 2026; 15 (3) : 3
URL: http://aums.abzums.ac.ir/article-1-1996-en.html
1- Department of Organic Chemistry, TMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. 2 Medical Genomics Research Center, Tehran Medical Sciences Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. & Medical Genomics Research Center, Tehran Medical Sciences Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, TMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, TMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Nanotechnology, TMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran & Medical Genomics Research Center, Tehran Medical Sciences Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. , alijebal2011@gmail.com
Abstract:   (27 Views)
Introduction: Polyaniline–polyacrylic copolymers represent an emerging class of polymeric materials with promising anticancer properties. The development of nanocarrier-based delivery systems may further enhance their biological activity and improve their selective effects on malignant cells. The present study aimed to synthesize and characterize nanoliposomes containing polyaniline–polyacrylic copolymers and to investigate their cytotoxic and apoptotic effects on breast cancer cells (MCF-7) in comparison with normal human cells.
Methods: In this experimental study, polyaniline–polyacrylic copolymers and nanoliposomal formulations containing the synthesized copolymers were initially prepared and characterized. The cellular effects of the free polyaniline–polyacrylic copolymer and its nanoliposomal formulation were subsequently evaluated in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells as a normal cell model. Following 48 hours of exposure, cellular viability and cytotoxicity were assessed using the MTT assay. Apoptotic cell death and changes in the distribution of apoptotic cell populations were evaluated by flow cytometry. In addition, the expression levels of apoptosis-related genes, including caspase-3 and caspase-9, were investigated using real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR). The study was conducted under the ethical approval code IR.IAU.PS.REC.1403.564.
Results: The MTT assay demonstrated that exposure to both the polyaniline–polyacrylic copolymer and its nanoliposomal formulation resulted in concentration-dependent changes in cell viability and cell death in both MCF-7 and HFF cells. The nanoliposomal formulation produced a greater cytotoxic effect against MCF-7 breast cancer cells than the free polyaniline–polyacrylic copolymer (P < 0.05). Flow cytometric analysis further demonstrated that both the free copolymer and the nanoliposomal formulation significantly promoted apoptotic cell death in MCF-7 cells, as evidenced by increases in the proportions of cells undergoing early and late apoptosis (P < 0.05). Moreover, treatment with the tested formulations resulted in increased expression of the caspase-3 and caspase-9 genes in MCF-7 cells, further supporting the involvement and activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Overall, these findings indicate that incorporation of the polyaniline–polyacrylic copolymer into nanoliposomes may enhance its anticancer activity and facilitate the induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that the polyaniline–polyacrylic copolymer possesses the potential to induce apoptotic cell death in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Encapsulation of the copolymer within nanoliposomes appeared to enhance its cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effects, suggesting that nanoliposomal delivery may represent a promising strategy for improving the anticancer potential of this polymeric compound. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms, optimize the nanoliposomal formulation, and evaluate its selectivity and therapeutic potential in additional in vitro and in vivo models.
Article number: 3
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/02/18 | Accepted: 2026/05/12 | Published: 2026/09/22

References
1. Hancock RE and Sahl H-G Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nature biotechnology 2006; 24(12): 1551-1557. [DOI:10.1038/nbt1267]
2. Vitale I, Yamazaki T, Wennerberg E, Sveinbjørnsson B, Rekdal Ø, Demaria S, et al. Targeting cancer heterogeneity with immune responses driven by oncolytic peptides. Trends in cancer 2021; 7(6): 557-572. [DOI:10.1016/j.trecan.2020.12.012]
3. Chiangjong W, Chutipongtanate S, and Hongeng S Anticancer peptide: Physicochemical property, functional aspect and trend in clinical application. International journal of oncology 2020; 57(3): 678-696. [DOI:10.3892/ijo.2020.5099]
4. Papo N and Shai Y Host defense peptides as new weapons in cancer treatment. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS 2005; 62784-790. [DOI:10.1007/s00018-005-4560-2]
5. Melo MN, Ferre R, and Castanho MA Antimicrobial peptides: linking partition, activity and high membrane-bound concentrations. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2009; 7(3): 245-250. [DOI:10.1038/nrmicro2095]
6. Zasloff M Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. nature 2002; 415(6870): 389-395. [DOI:10.1038/415389a]
7. Schweizer F Cationic amphiphilic peptides with cancer-selective toxicity. European journal of pharmacology 2009; 625(1-3): 190-194. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.08.043]
8. Baxter AA, Lay FT, Poon IK, Kvansakul M, and Hulett MD Tumor cell membrane-targeting cationic antimicrobial peptides: novel insights into mechanisms of action and therapeutic prospects. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2017; 74(20): 3809-3825. [DOI:10.1007/s00018-017-2604-z]
9. Thadi A, Morano WF, Khalili M, Babcock BD, Shaikh MF, Foster DS, et al. Molecular targeting of H/MDM-2 Oncoprotein in Human Colon Cancer Cells and stem-like colonic epithelial-derived progenitor cells. Anticancer research 2021; 41(1): 27-42. [DOI:10.21873/anticanres.14749]
10. Zhang P, Zhang Y, Ding X, Shen W, Li M, Wagner E, et al. A multistage cooperative nanoplatform enables intracellular co‐delivery of proteins and chemotherapeutics for cancer therapy. Advanced Materials 2020; 32(46): 2000013. [DOI:10.1002/adma.202000013]
11. Grandič M, Zovko A, Frangež R, Turk T, and Sepčić K Binding and permeabilization of lipid bilayers by natural and synthetic 3-alkylpyridinium polymers. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 2012; 20(5): 1659-1664. [DOI:10.1016/j.bmc.2012.01.027]
12. Zhong G, Yang C, Liu S, Zheng Y, Lou W, Teo JY, et al. Polymers with distinctive anticancer mechanism that kills MDR cancer cells and inhibits tumor metastasis. Biomaterials 2019; 19976-87. [DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.036]
13. Bagheri N, Lakouraj MM, Nabavi SR, Tashakkorian H, and Mohseni M Synthesis of bioactive polyaniline-b-polyacrylic acid copolymer nanofibrils as an effective antibacterial and anticancer agent in cancer therapy, especially for HT29 treatment. RSC advances 2020; 10(42): 25290-25304. [DOI:10.1039/D0RA03779F]
14. Shao N, Yuan L, Ma P, Zhou M, Xiao X, Cong Z, et al. Heterochiral β-peptide polymers combating multidrug-resistant cancers effectively without inducing drug resistance. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022; 144(16): 7283-7294. [DOI:10.1021/jacs.2c00452]
15. Chen R, Khormaee S, Eccleston ME, and Slater NK The role of hydrophobic amino acid grafts in the enhancement of membrane-disruptive activity of pH-responsive pseudo-peptides. Biomaterials 2009; 30(10): 1954-1961. [DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.036]
16. Omole AO, Zhao Z, Chang-Liao S, Affonso de Oliveira JF, Boone CE, Sutorus L, et al. Virus nanotechnology for intratumoural immunotherapy. Nature reviews bioengineering 2024; 2(11): 916-929. [DOI:10.1038/s44222-024-00231-z]
17. Meerani S and Yao Y Oncolytic viruses in cancer therapy. European Journal of Scientific Research 2010; 40(1): 156-171.
18. Tähtinen S, Feola S, Capasso C, Laustio N, Groeneveldt C, Ylösmäki EO, et al. Exploiting preexisting immunity to enhance oncolytic cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Research 2020; 80(12): 2575-2585. [DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2062]
19. Pierce KM, Miklavcic WR, Cook KP, Hennen MS, Bayles KW, Hollingsworth MA, et al. The evolution and future of targeted cancer therapy: from nanoparticles, oncolytic viruses, and oncolytic bacteria to the treatment of solid tumors. Nanomaterials 2021; 11(11): 3018. [DOI:10.3390/nano11113018]
20. Niculescu A-G and Grumezescu AM Novel tumor-targeting nanoparticles for cancer treatment-A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022; 23(9): 5253. [DOI:10.3390/ijms23095253]
21. Aguilera-Correa JJ, Esteban J, and Vallet-Regí M Inorganic and polymeric nanoparticles for human viral and bacterial infections prevention and treatment. Nanomaterials 2021; 11(1): 137. [DOI:10.3390/nano11010137]
22. Spirescu VA, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM, and Andronescu E Polymeric nanoparticles for antimicrobial therapies: An up-to-date overview. Polymers 2021; 13(5): 724. [DOI:10.3390/polym13050724]
23. Jana D and Zhao Y. Strategies for enhancing cancer chemodynamic therapy performance. in Exploration. 2022. Wiley Online Library. [DOI:10.1002/EXP.20210238]
24. Hu H, Feng W, Qian X, Yu L, Chen Y, and Li Y Emerging nanomedicine‐enabled/enhanced nanodynamic therapies beyond traditional photodynamics. Advanced Materials 2021; 33(12): 2005062. [DOI:10.1002/adma.202005062]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Alborz University Medical Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb