Volume 13, Issue 2 (Spring 2024)
aumj 2024, 13(2): 111-124 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nazari N, Imani S, Pakdaman S, Shokri O. Comparison of self-regulation in adolescents with and without symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder or sluggish cognitive tempo. aumj 2024; 13 (2) :111-124
URL: http://aums.abzums.ac.ir/article-1-1678-en.html
URL: http://aums.abzums.ac.ir/article-1-1678-en.html
1- Masters in Child and Adolescence Clinical Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Counseling Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor of Psychology Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4- Assistant Professor in the Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Counseling Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor of Psychology Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4- Assistant Professor in the Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (546 Views)
Background: studies are trying to differentiate two disorders, Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and Sluggish cognitive tempo, due to their similarities. In this regard, the present study was conducted with the aim of comparing self-regulation and substance use tendencies in adolescents with and without symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder or sluggish cognitive tempo.
Methods: The study was in the frame of Causal Comparative design. The statistical population includes parents and adolescents aged 13 to 17 years with the symptoms of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder, sluggish cognitive tempo and normal adolescents in Karaj in 2022. The method of sampling was available and using it, 150 people (50 with attention deficit/hyperactivity, 50 with sluggish cognitive tempo and 50 normal adolescents) were selected. The tools of data collection were the Rating of Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Inventory, Adolescent Self-Regulatory Inventory, and Addiction Susceptibility Questionnaire-Adolescent Version. Finally, the data were analyzed using the analysis of variance and Sheffe's post hoc test.
Results: The findings showed that the self-regulation scores are respectively and significantly lower in the attention deficit/hyperactivity group, the sluggish cognitive tempo group, and the normal group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in the scores of substance use tendency between adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and with sluggish cognitive tempo; But the difference between the two groups compared to normal adolescents was significant.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that adolescents with and without symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder or sluggish cognitive tempo are different in terms of self-regulation and substance use tendencies.
Methods: The study was in the frame of Causal Comparative design. The statistical population includes parents and adolescents aged 13 to 17 years with the symptoms of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder, sluggish cognitive tempo and normal adolescents in Karaj in 2022. The method of sampling was available and using it, 150 people (50 with attention deficit/hyperactivity, 50 with sluggish cognitive tempo and 50 normal adolescents) were selected. The tools of data collection were the Rating of Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Inventory, Adolescent Self-Regulatory Inventory, and Addiction Susceptibility Questionnaire-Adolescent Version. Finally, the data were analyzed using the analysis of variance and Sheffe's post hoc test.
Results: The findings showed that the self-regulation scores are respectively and significantly lower in the attention deficit/hyperactivity group, the sluggish cognitive tempo group, and the normal group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in the scores of substance use tendency between adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and with sluggish cognitive tempo; But the difference between the two groups compared to normal adolescents was significant.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that adolescents with and without symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder or sluggish cognitive tempo are different in terms of self-regulation and substance use tendencies.
Keywords: attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, sluggish cognitive tempo, self-regulation, substance use tendency, adolescents
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/06/06 | Accepted: 2024/02/07 | Published: 2024/06/01
Received: 2023/06/06 | Accepted: 2024/02/07 | Published: 2024/06/01
References
1. Gestsdottir S, Lerner RM. Positive development in adolescence: The development and role of intentional self-regulation. Hum Dev 2008;51(3): 202-24. [DOI:10.1159/000135757]
2. Zablotsky B, Black LI, Maenner MJ, et al. Prevalence and trends of developmental disabilities among children in the United States: 2009-2017. Pediatrics 2019;4:144. [DOI:10.1542/peds.2019-0811]
3. Maoz H, Gvirts HZ, Sheffer M, Bloch Y. Theory of mind and empathy in children with ADHD. J attention disorders 2019;23(11): 1331-8. [DOI:10.1177/1087054717710766]
4. Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Txet Revision (DSM-5-TR). Arlington, VA, US: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.2022.
5. Larsson H, Dilshad R, Lichtenstein P, Barker ED. Developmental trajectories of DSM‐IV symptoms of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Genetic effects, family risk and associated psychopathology. J Child Psychol and Psychiatry 2011;52(9): 954-63. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02379.x]
6. Barkley RA. Distinguishing sluggish cognitive tempo from ADHD in children and adolescents: executive functioning, impairment, and comorbidity. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2013;42(2): 161-73. [DOI:10.1080/15374416.2012.734259]
7. Abbasi NM. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Three Presentations or not? SCT: Another Presentation of ADHD. Iran J N Psychol Res 2020;15(57): 19-33 [In Persian].
8. Becker SP, Willcutt EG, Leopold DR, et al. Report of a work group on sluggish cognitive tempo: Key research directions and a consensus change in terminology to cognitive disengagement syndrome. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2022.07.821]
9. Becker SP. Sluggish cognitive tempo and peer functioning in school-aged children: A six-month longitudinal study. Psychiatry Res 2014;217(1-2): 72-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.007]
10. Becker SP, Barkley RA. Sluggish cognitive tempo. Oxford textbook of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 2018: 147-53. [DOI:10.1093/med/9780198739258.003.0015]
11. Carlson CL, Mann M. Sluggish cognitive tempo predicts a different pattern of impairment in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive type. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2002;31(1): 123-9. [DOI:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3101_14]
12. Lovett BJ, Wood WL, Lewandowski LJ. Differential diagnosis of sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms in college students. J Attention Disorders 2021;25(9): 1251-9. [DOI:10.1177/1087054719896856]
13. Wood WL, Lewandowski LJ, Lovett BJ, Antshel K. Sluggish cognitive tempo and impairment: The role of lifestyle factors. Psychol Sch 2020;57(7): 1171-88. [DOI:10.1002/pits.22378]
14. Nelson JM, Lovett BJ. Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT), Comorbid Psychopathology, and Functional Impairment in College Students: The Clinical Utility of SCT Subfactors. Journal of Attention Disorders 2023;27(3): 313-23. [DOI:10.1177/10870547221142458]
15. Garner AA, Marceaux JC, Mrug S, et al. Dimensions and correlates of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and sluggish cognitive tempo. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2010;38: 1097-107. [DOI:10.1007/s10802-010-9436-8]
16. Burns GL, Becker SP. Sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD symptoms in a nationally representative sample of US children: Differentiation using categorical and dimensional approaches. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2021;50(2): 267-80. [DOI:10.1080/15374416.2019.1678165]
17. Barkley RA. Barkley sluggish cognitive tempo scale--children and adolescents (BSCTS-CA): Guilford Publications; 2018.
18. Burns GL, Becker SP, Servera M, et al. Sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) inattention in the home and school contexts: Parent and teacher invariance and cross-setting validity. Psychol Assess 2017;29(2):209. [DOI:10.1037/pas0000325]
19. Howard SJ, Vasseleu E, Neilsen-Hewett C, et al., editors. Predicting academic school readiness and risk status from different assessment approaches and constructs of early self-regulation. Child & Youth Care Forum; 2022: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/s10566-021-09636-y]
20. Kiani M, Hejazi E, Ejei J, Lavasani MG. A Study of Psychometric Properties of Adolescent Self-Regulatory Inventory among Female Secondary Schools Students. J Psychol 2017;1(21): 3-22 [In Persian].
21. Moffitt TE, Arseneault L, Belsky D, et al. A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the national Acad of Sci 2011;108(7): 2693-8. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1010076108]
22. Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ. Childhood self-control and adult outcomes: results from a 30-year longitudinal study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2013;52(7): 709-17.e1. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.04.008]
23. Flannery AJ, Becker SP, Luebbe AM. Does emotion dysregulation mediate the association between sluggish cognitive tempo and college students' social impairment? J attention disorders 2016;20(9):802-12. [DOI:10.1177/1087054714527794]
24. Afshary M, Babakhani N, Ahmadi A, shamseddinilorry S. Comparison of the Rate of Self- Esteem, Self- Efficacy & Self- Regulation in Opiates & Stimulant Substance Dependents with Normal People. Iran J Forensic Med 2016;22(1): 15-22 [In Persian]. [DOI:10.4324/9781315651828-3]
25. Cavicchioli M, Ogliari A, Movalli M, Maffei C. Persistent Deficits in Self-Regulation as a Mediator between Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Substance Use Disorders. Subst Use Misuse 2022;57(12): 1837-53. [DOI:10.1080/10826084.2022.2120358]
26. Boland R, Verdiun M, Ruiz P. Kaplan & Sadock's synopsis of psychiatry: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2021.
27. Gül A, Gül H. Evaluation of childhood Sluggish Cognitive Tempo among patients with substance use disorder, substance-induced psychosis and childhood ADHD. Neurol Sci 2019. [DOI:10.14744/DAJPNS.2019.00020]
28. Kirk CL. Do Symptoms of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Independently Predict Social Functioning or Risky Behavior in a College Student Sample? : Auburn University; 2018.
29. Zeinali A, Wahdat R, Eisavi M. Pre-addiction Susceptibility Backgrounds in Recovered Drug Users. Iran J Psychiatry and Clin Psychol 2008;14(1): 71-9 [In Persian].
30. Ahmadi Z, Moradi Y. Investigating the causes of high school students' tendency to drug addiction. The 5th International Conference on Psychology, Education and Lifestyle2018. p. 1 - 7 [In Persian].
31. Ghanizadeh A, Jafari P. Cultural structures of the Persian parents' ratings of ADHD. J attention disorders 2010;13(4): 369-73. [DOI:10.1177/1087054709332421]
32. Burns G, Lee S, Servera M, et al. Child and adolescent behavior inventory-parent version 1.0. Pullman, WA: Author 2015.
33. Jung S-H, Lee S, Burns GL, Becker SP. Internal and external validity of self-report and parent-report measures of sluggish cognitive tempo in South Korean adolescents. J Psychopatholo and Behav Assess 2021;43:355-66. [DOI:10.1007/s10862-020-09821-8]
34. hamivand L, alizadeh H, Kazemi F, Farohki N. Designing a psycho-social program for students with sluggish cognitive tempo, and examining its effectiveness on speed and accuracy of information processing and socio-emotional difficulties. Allameh Tabataba'i 2018: [In Persian] [Thesis].
35. Moilanen KL. The adolescent self-regulatory inventory: The development and validation of a questionnaire of short-term and long-term self-regulation. J Youth Adolesc 2007;36: 835-48. [DOI:10.1007/s10964-006-9107-9]
36. Zeinali A. Validation of Addiction Susceptibility Questionnaire in Iran Adolescents (ASQ-AV). J Clin Psycol 2014;6(3): 81-93 [In Persian].
37. Collado-Valero J, Navarro-Soria I, Delgado-Domenech B, et al. ADHD and sluggish cognitive tempo: comparing executive functioning response patterns. Sustainability 2021;13(19): 10506. [DOI:10.3390/su131910506]
38. Jarrett MA, Rapport HF, Rondon AT, Becker SP. ADHD dimensions and sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms in relation to self-report and laboratory measures of neuropsychological functioning in college students. J Attention Disorders 2017;21(8): 673-83. [DOI:10.1177/1087054714560821]
39. Strauman TJ. Self-regulation and psychopathology: Toward an integrative translational research paradigm. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2017;13: 497-523. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045012]
40. Başay Ö, Çiftçi E, Becker SP, Burns GL. Validity of sluggish cognitive tempo in Turkish children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2021;52: 191-9. [DOI:10.1007/s10578-020-01110-5]
41. Becker SP, Burns GL, Smith ZR, Langberg JM. Sluggish cognitive tempo in adolescents with and without ADHD: Differentiation from adolescent-reported ADHD inattention and unique associations with internalizing domains. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2020;48: 391-406. [DOI:10.1007/s10802-019-00603-9]
42. Mohammadi E, Shadbafi M. Comparison of Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment, Response Inhibition and Sustained Attention Between School Boys With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Sluggish Cognitive Tempo. Iran J Psychiatry and Clin Psychol 2021;27(2): 180-93 [In Persian]. [DOI:10.32598/ijpcp.27.2.3294.1]
43. Shadbafi M, Abdolrahimpour R, Mohammadi E. Comparison of Response Inhibition and Sustained Attention in ADHD and SCT Children: Distinct Contribution of ADHD and SCT to Attention Problems Based on Cold and Hot Executive Circuits. Iran J Exceptional Children 2020;20(4): 37 - 50 [In Persian].
44. Gordel JA, Bayrami M, Hashemi T. Predicting Substance Abuse from Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Adult. Iran J Res on Addict 2013;7(27): 93 - 106 [In Persian].
45. Fatséas M, Hurmic H, Serre F, et al. Addiction severity pattern associated with adult and childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in patients with addictions. Psychiatry Res 2016;246: 656-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.071]
46. Rastikerdar N, Nejati V, Sammaknejad N, Fathabadi J. Developmental trajectory of hot and cold executive functions in children with and without attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Res Dev Disabil 2023;137: 104514. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104514]
47. Dekkers TJ, de Water E, Scheres A. Impulsive and risky decision-making in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): The need for a developmental perspective. Current opinion in psychol 2022;44: 330-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.11.002]
48. Stellern J, Xiao KB, Grennell E, et al. Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Addict 2023;118(1): 30-47. [DOI:10.1111/add.16001]
49. Yan Y, Shields GS, Zhang Y, et al. Child executive function and future externalizing and internalizing problems: A meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies. Clin Psychology Rev 2022: 102194. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102194]
50. Asadi Sm, Porzoor P. Investigating the causes of tendency to use substances (addiction) in Ardabil. Res on Addict 2020;14(56):169-98.[In Persian]. [DOI:10.29252/etiadpajohi.14.56.169]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
